Hi everyone,
I’m the maintainer of NoPager, an open-source project exploring a safer way to handle deployment failures for small teams using GitHub + Vercel.
The problem:
Many small teams can deploy quickly, but when something breaks, debugging still means manually checking:
- what changed in GitHub
- which deployment failed
- whether the issue is code, configuration, or environment related
NoPager explores a workflow like:
broken deployment → collect evidence → prepare a small repair PR → verify with Vercel Preview → human approval before production changes
The important part is the approval boundary. The goal is not uncontrolled AI changes in production.
Current progress:
✅ GitHub PR → Vercel Preview integration verified 🚧 Testing the complete production recovery workflow
I’d like feedback from people running real Vercel applications:
- What information do you need before trusting a repair suggestion?
- Which deployment actions should always require human approval?
- Would a workflow like this be useful for your team?
Open source: