⌘K
NextBlock™ CMS Just submitted our application for **NextBlock CMS**! 🚀 NextBlock is an open-source, full-stack CMS framework built natively for **Next.js 16 (App Router + RSC)** and **Supabase (PostgreSQL JSONB)**. We’ve focused on: * **Zero-Config 1-Click Deploy:** Automated Supabase database migrations on build. * **100/100 Lighthouse Defaults:** Tiptap visual editor renders PostgreSQL JSONB directly into React Server Components, eliminating client hydration overhead and HTML sanitization taxes. * **Cortex AI & Native MCP:** Model Context Protocol server support (`/api/mcp`) for deterministic, schema-constrained block synthesis. * **GitHub:** https://github.com/nextblock-cms/nextblock * **Live Sandbox:** https://cms.nextblock.dev Looking forward to the review process and collaborating with the Vercel DX team! 🧱
Axyl1410 Hi! I applied for the Summer 2026 Vercel OSS Program, but I’m not sure whether my application was successfully submitted. I also didn’t receive a confirmation email. Is there any way for applicants to verify whether their application was received, or is there normally no confirmation email after submitting the form? I’d like to avoid submitting a duplicate application if my original submission went through. Thanks!
Amy Egan If you reached the final page that says, "Thank you," then your application was received :) You'll get an email about a week after applications close letting your know whether or not your project was accepted
Ryu Hi Mohsin, Good catch. That definitely looks like a diagnostics/UI bug rather than an actionable domain error. If the real issue was DNS misconfiguration, then showing a value like: ``` Windows/10.0.20348 cosmos-netstandard-sdk/3.18.0 ``` is pretty misleading, because it sends people toward their app/runtime stack instead of the actual domain/certificate checks. For anyone else landing here, I would not treat that kind of string as the cause of the cert failure. I’d still debug the domain normally: live `A`/`CNAME`, no conflicting `AAAA`, CAA records, and whether the HTTP validation path can reach Vercel cleanly. The useful bug report details here are probably the exact domain status shown in the dashboard, the misleading error text, approximate timestamp, and confirmation that fixing DNS resolved the certificate issue. That should make it easier for Vercel to trace where the wrong field is being rendered.
Mhslr This just happened to me. I removed and added back the domain to fix it.
system Thank you for bringing this to our attention. To ensure this is investigated with the necessary priority and privacy, please report all security-related concerns, potential exploits, or abuse directly to the Vercel Security Team. Please submit your report here: vercel.com/abuse Reporting via this official channel is the fastest way to reach our security engineers and ensures that sensitive information is handled in a secure environment rather than a public forum.
Truenone This isn't a security vulnerability report. It's a request to review and unpause my Hobby project, which was paused due to a one-day usage spike from unwanted traffic. Could someone from the support team take a look? Thanks.
system Thank you for bringing this to our attention. To ensure this is investigated with the necessary priority and privacy, please report all security-related concerns, potential exploits, or abuse directly to the Vercel Security Team. Please submit your report here: vercel.com/abuse Reporting via this official channel is the fastest way to reach our security engineers and ensures that sensitive information is handled in a secure environment rather than a public forum.
Amy Egan Hey @dharuvmanchanda. I just came across your post and wanted to check if you're still having trouble with you account. Hopefully this was already solved, but please let me know if you still need help
system Thank you for bringing this to our attention. To ensure this is investigated with the necessary priority and privacy, please report all security-related concerns, potential exploits, or abuse directly to the Vercel Security Team. Please submit your report here: vercel.com/abuse Reporting via this official channel is the fastest way to reach our security engineers and ensures that sensitive information is handled in a secure environment rather than a public forum.
arve27 Hi Vercel team, it has been almost three weeks since this issue occurred. I would really appreciate a response from the team so I know this issue will be reviewed soon. Thank you.
Gucpcdeveloper 3632 Why forcing chat prompts for simple fixes is burning Pro credits and slowing us down Like many other users have pointed out recently, turning the code editor into a strictly read-only viewer is doing the exact opposite of what a development tool should do. If I need to change a single class name, update a Tailwind padding value, or fix a minor variable, having to type out a chat prompt and burn generation credits—just for the AI to potentially touch unrelated files—is an enormous time waste. AI should be there to handle heavy boilerplate and architecture, not lock us out of our own source code for trivial one-line tweaks. Right now, it feels like an unnecessary barrier that forces unnecessary credit spending. If direct code editing isn't brought back, many of us are seriously going to look at alternative platforms that respect developer workflow and efficiency.
Samssharma 7158 Same as you - I'm in the process of moving to Dyad. These guys have totally lost the plot and it's about time we leave then en masse.
Samssharma 7158 Btw, In case you guys have missed, see the latest response from Amy (Vercel staff), on the Meta thread. So unhelpful.
Chintan Hi @williaamlow-beep Welcome to vercel community. Have you write query to Vercel billing team via "billing(at)vercel.com"
Amy Egan @williaamlow-beep just came across this post and wanted to make sure this is no longer a problem. Were you able to open a support case at vercel.com/help to get it solved?
