Credit Deduction Seems Incorrect & "Go To Code" Broken

v0
1

Hi everyone,

I’m uncertain about how the credits system works. However, when I compare my credits with the reported cost of each V0 AI operation, it appears that I might be being charged double for each task. Is this normal?

I had a total of 2.00 gifted credits and 4.00 monthly credits.

  1. I made an operation that used 0.442 credits and ended up with 1.12 credits, resulting in a charge of 0.88.
  2. I made an operation that used 0.159 credits and ended up with 0.80 credits, resulting in a charge of 0.32.
  3. I made an operation that used 0.075 credits and ended up with 0.65 credits, resulting in a charge of 0.15.
  4. I made an operation that used 0.415 credits, which brought my gifted credits down to 0.00 and left me with 3.82 on my monthly credits, resulting in a charge of 0.83.

Additionally, I’ve noticed that for the past week or so, the “Go To Code” feature in the Design component has stopped placing the cursor at the intended position in the code on the page. Instead, it simply opens the page without directing the cursor to the correct location.

I’m not sure if this is the intended behavior of a recent rollout update or if I did something to my website that disabled that feature.

Thanks for your help!

4

Ive actually had this same issue. Would love to know a fix for it.
@pawlean ?

1 Like
5

Hi @luistorresmail-4285,

  1. Could you share the timestamps and message ID of these transactions you mentioned? This will help me figure out the cause.
  2. I can also recreate this. Let me follow with our team what caused this.
6

Hi Anshuman (@anshumanb),
Here are the message IDs along with their timestamps:

Nov 30, 2025, 7:02 PM:
lMhEsBYGTas#ClDvPvP912P7KSc3WLXwxrf44hp4gQbo
Nov 30, 2025, 7:07 PM:
lMhEsBYGTas#KrC7WAOmjdaQwhonrocNBhrGXIZ9APRf
Nov 30, 2025, 7:24 PM:
lMhEsBYGTas#xwavHg995Ry0uDB5IVu0LvG5bBMRUVaR
Nov 30, 2025, 7:40 PM:
lMhEsBYGTas#xb1nxBZalOHwZe1LrGVOgrJ9Oecae6Z8
Nov 30, 2025, 10:18 PM:
lMhEsBYGTas#1TtSNUh9WaJtnHRQSc1OcuBiJpAAh3RG

Additionally, here’s a video that demonstrates the process:

Please let me know if you require any additional information. Thanks!

1 Like
7

Hi @luistorresmail-4285, welcome to the Vercel Community!

Thanks for sharing the details. I was able to confirm the discrepancy.

However, I think it’s merely an issue that the usage display under message is not updated to show the usage for Claude preview model. Rest assured you are charged the correct prices by our billing.

I’ve asked our team to confirm and fix the issue.

2 Likes
9

Thank you for your response @anshumanb.

It appears that the Claude model is twice as expensive as the standard V0 agent. I should have checked the pricing beforehand. No problem.

Since the “Go To Code” fix is just a matter of time, I believe we can consider this matter resolved.

I appreciate your assistance!

2 Likes