Jacob Paris There doesn't appear to be a systemic issue with the keys (low 401 rate and I can successfully follow your steps) Evidence points to your API key being rejected. The thing to focus on here is the cURL request, since that eliminates anything weird Codex could be doing You will get a 401 if that $V0_API_KEY variable is undefined, in case your export V0_API_KEY command executed in a different environment and the variable didn't carry over to when you ran your curl command, so make sure you test them back to back ➜ ~ export V0_API_KEY="v1:……………………………………………………………………………………………O" ➜ ~ curl -s -o /dev/n

loai Hi Jacob, Thanks again for following up — I finally managed to get the Vercel key itself working, but I’ve run into a second, CLI-specific problem that’s preventing me from switching my default provider back to OpenAI. Where things stand now | Step | Result | | | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------- | | 1. curl with V0\_API\_KEY | ✅ returns 200 (v0-1.5-md) — so the key & billing are good. | | | 2. codex --provider ver

William I couldn't get it to work too. I followed the v0 docs and have the provider vercel added in config.json , and then I have V0_API_KEY in env along side OPENAI_API_KEY (which seems to be the cause of the issue) curl with V0_API_KEY returns 200 as well I think it is an upstream issue reported in the codex repo: github.com/openai/codex/issues/987 and the issue seems to be related to being logged in with openai keys and then trying to switch to other providers.

Kasu community.vercel.com/t/updated-v0-pricing/10612/113

YW I agree—this new pricing model from Vercel could mark the decline of V0's success.

Anshuman Bhardwaj Hi @sparkpressstudios, I'm sorry to hear this. As far as I understand, you were charged $45 by Supabase? To clarify: Supabase is a separate company/product from Vercel; we do provide easy integration between Supabase/Vercel/v0, but the cost of using external services is not included in v0/Vercel plans.

Jacob Paris I actually don't see the Lenny subscription on your account Is there any chance you used a different account (maybe logged in with github vs email) for that?

App 1427 That's why I think something is quite strange with my account. This is account I have used for subscription. On my profile I see Plan Summary Premium (free) badge and before I have never subscribed to premium for v0 service.

App 1427 Also it's been a week and even though I have submitted 2 support tickets, I get no response rather than your message here... ☹️

Jacob Paris Can you explain more about the specific errors you're getting? There are some things that won't work in the preview due to it being a simulated browser/server environment

Aleks Thanks Jacob, I've seen few types of failures, some about the missing dependency (or maybe just bubbling up like this but being a runtime error), the latest one I see is this: withDragAndDrop is not a function at (/components/calendar/calendar-view) It works locally, it works on production build, it used to work on the preview as well... I've tried to fork the thread, it just still stays and I cannot get rid of it.

Jacob Paris You can see your usage logs at Settings -> Billing It looks like you sent 32 messages with the v0 Large model averaging around $0.62 each. If cost is a concern, the v0 Small model is about 12 times cheaper

Hungrysquirrel Same issue with my projects too and no response from v0 community.vercel.com/t/recharts-no-longer-loading-in-a-prototype-that-has-had-no-changes/13350

イタズラ Experienced this earlier today with the small model. I don't mind if it's a small mistake, but generating completely invalid code and charging to fix it is a little off:

Anshuman Bhardwaj Hi @hayko97, I'm sorry you are facing this issue. Can you share some examples of the issues you faced? Chat IDs or URLs will help us narrow the issue down.

Anshuman Bhardwaj Hi @amorepi, welcome to the Vercel Community! I'm sorry that it's taking longer than you expected. Let me check with our team to see if there's something we can do.

Anshuman Bhardwaj Hi @amorepi, it seems like Hostinger has 7 days after the transfer to decline or approve it. If they do nothing, it automatically gets approved after those 7 days. So, based on your request, it seems like the transfer will complete on the 18th. There's nothing we can do to expedite this process.

Jacob Paris v0 in the browser does not have access to a filesystem to load files, so it can't actually read the CSV directly The easiest way to get a similar result would be to convert your CSV files to JSON and save it as a JS file, which you can import directly in your code export const data = [] I'd recommend doing this either by manual edit in the code or locally on your machine and using Git Sync to push it back, since telling the AI to transform a large file will use a lot of tokens

Arnus67 Dear Jacob, thank you very much for your reply! Ok for converting in JSON format. But where should I put the file then in order to secure it (user should not be able to access it) while letting v0 access it? Is it the ideal solution for you or would you suggest anything else? The initial Idea behind the csv was to be able to quickly adjust the data easily with excel. Without letting user access it, it needs to be secured. Again, thank you for your help! Arnaud

Arnus67 I would like to follow up on my previous message. Do you see any better, simpler or more dynamic solutions?

Jacob Paris We don't seem to be doing any manipulation here so unfortunately no extra clues there – a malformed dependency for the https package would be the best explanation Make sure you regenerate your lockfile (if you haven't done that already) Can you share your package.json deps so I can check to see if there's anything suspicious there?

JT I am having the same issue. Have you found a solution?

Giacomo Gaglione me too, same issue. EDIT: confirmed npm incident npm Status - Issues with package install, package publish, and login.

Amy Egan Hey @natoriklarius-1613. I checked the credit logs for your account to make sure you received your Premium credits. It looks like the $20 of credits were added and have been spent on messages using the large model. The large model does use more credits than the other options. I use the medium model for most things, and the small model is a great way to limit credit use for for relatively simple tasks. You can see all usage events listed at v0.dev/chat/settings/billing

Jacob Paris Can you explain what you mean with missing versions? If I understand your timeline you worked on a file you renewed your subscription you did further work in the same chat at some point those versions were reverted?

Soko Technologies Timeline is accurate except the last one: I was able to continue working on the same project after renew but I am unable to deploy the changes. I was able to do that prior to the renewal. I tried to download the latest changes I made so I can commit the most recent version and I was unable to download the files. I checked back later and both the code and the preview for the latest version (and all versions after the renewal) can't be loaded. See attached the screen I am currently seeing when I switch to the latest version.

Soko Technologies @jacobparis any update on this please? This is a huge blocker for me and I need to know whether there'd be any resolution to this quickly so we can start looking at alternative approaches to continuing with work.

Pauline P. Narvas Have you got any chat examples for us to try and replicate?