⌘K
Suheb This looks like a useful approach, especially keeping the QR generation fully client-side. Using Next.js 16 should also make it easier to keep the toolkit fast and lightweight. The focus on privacy is a nice touch since users don't need to upload their QR data to a server.
Kris Dev Thanks! That was exactly the goal. I wanted the core QR workflow to stay fully client-side so users can generate, style, and export their QR codes without sending the payload to a backend. It also keeps the architecture simple and lightweight, which fits well with the kind of utility I want QR Forge to be. Appreciate the feedback!
Ikarov Hey @amyegan, just bringing this back to your attention in case you missed it. Thanks!
Amy Egan Appreciate you reaching out. I'd love to see it stay in the hands of the community rather than have Vercel take over. Feel free to ask around here and in Next.js Discussions to find your successor!
Ikarov Thanks, @amyegan ! Just to clarify, I'm also open to discussing a potential acquisition of the @nextjs username itself, alongside the community. Given the long-standing association with Next.js, I thought it might be particularly valuable in the hands of Vercel or the official team. Would this be something worth discussing with the right person?
system The domain troubleshooting guide can help with most custom domain configuration issues. You might be able to use that guide to solve it before a human is available to help you. Then you can come back here and share the answer for bonus points. vercel.com/docs/domains/troubleshooting
Galz Update: with Logs in Live mode (no filters except path /), pressing "Scrape Again" in Meta's Sharing Debugger produces no request at all in my project's logs, while the debugger reports 403. Other visitors and crawlers show up normally with 200. My project firewall shows facebookexternalhit as allowed via a Bypass rule, Bot Protection is off, and there are no persistent actions. So Meta's crawler is being blocked at Vercel's edge before reaching the project. Can someone check the platform-level mitigation for www.offband.pro?
system The domain troubleshooting guide can help with most custom domain configuration issues. You might be able to use that guide to solve it before a human is available to help you. Then you can come back here and share the answer for bonus points. vercel.com/docs/domains/troubleshooting
Oyaminstitute 8152 It needs vercel human
Amy Egan Hey, James. Appreciate you reaching out about this. The team shipped an update yesterday so your dashboard now reflects each day's deployment storage amount instead of the billing period maximum. I'm linking some Deployment Storage optimization tips in case you still need help reducing the amount of storage used vercel.com/docs/deployment-storage/optimize
James Singleton Hi Amy. Yea after doing some Googling I was able to find stuff about it. It's a little concerning that this was pushed out without an email letting users know. All of a sudden I was getting emails saying that I was using 40 GB of the 10 GB of deployment storage with a single deployment taking up like 30 GB. I started to panic! One issue I ran into is that retention policies were defaulted to 30 days for everything. Even after setting some to 1 week and in some cases 1 day, I wasn't seeing deployments being removed. I had to go through and manually delete deployments. I basically had to delete
James Singleton To add to this, there are projects where the retention is 30 days and I have deployments from January still in my Deployments tab. This project was defaulted to 30 days and I have deployments from Jan-May still there.
