last comment
⌘K
Anshuman Bhardwaj Hi @hasriza, welcome to the Vercel Community! Thanks for taking the time to write up detailed feedback. I'll share it with the team. As with any AI product the output should always be double checked because the AI editors are prone to overdoing or hallucinations.
riza Hi @anshumanb, I do agree with your point regarding hallucinations and as valid as it is, if there was a way to list and restore deleted files and folders after the new version is created, it would probably save a lot of time in my opinion. I also have a feeling that these files are not explicitly deleted but are lost mid generation due to incomplete implementation of the changes requested.
Richardnugen 6495 This also happens in my environment. Especially with any changes I make outside of v0. For instance, if I pull the code locally from github, modify, push and then sync in v0. The next edit v0 will delete my changes. It is very aggressive with this. For instance, I changed the .gitignore file and it delete my changes. Not to mention the forms I created and routes I added.
Okeul855 1337 I'm truly desperate. I tried again, but it's still not working. V0 said there's a high chance the issue is caused by me doing 3D development, but I don't know how to do 3D development at all — I don't even know how to create anything in 3D.
Pauline P. Narvas Hi, Okeul! Welcome to the Vercel Community. I'm sorry to hear that you've been having issues with a runtime error in v0. I recommend checking out the following resources which may help you debug: community.vercel.com/t/become-a-v0-expert/5981 We also have other members who managed to get a solution to similar errors which may be helpful: community.vercel.com/search?q=runtime%20error%20status:solved%20%23v0
Pauline P. Narvas Hi, Nadia! Welcome to the Vercel Community. Hopefully this post helps: community.vercel.com/t/bidirectional-git-sync-for-v0-premium-users-is-now-in-beta/11176
Nadia Hi Pauline, thanks for the reply and sharing this. I think this actually might mean there's an issue (or I'm still not understanding how it works) as in the announcement it says "You can connect your chat to GitHub to either main or another branch and every new generation will be synced as a new commit" - but this hasn't been my experience with the feature as described in my message! It's what I thought it should do but the number of commits generated definitely don't match if this is actually working in this manner.
Marlon Vidal having the same problem here
Jacob Paris You can clear the chat history at any time by clicking "Fork". This will create a fresh chat in the same project with your deployment settings, environment variables, integrations, etc all intact, and if you deploy the new fork it'll take over as the main deployment for that generation I rarely get beyond v20 before forking to a new chat and usually fork every time I deploy
Anthony Yang Thanks for getting back to me, Jacob — much appreciated. I’ll give the “Fork” method a try, as it sounds like a logical way to maintain performance while preserving the project setup. I’ll return to the thread once I’ve tested it to share whether it resolves the slowdown. Thanks again.
Jacob Paris Hey, thanks for digging into this Are you saying you have a postcss.config.js file in v0 that's not being included when you deploy? Or that after sending prompts, sometimes v0 deletes the postcss.config.js file, and in that state it still works in the preview but breaks when deployed?
Aryan384 so when you give a prompt to the V0 about chainging UI in the project sometimes it deletes the postcss config file and then if this file doesnt include in the project VERCEL will deploy it without it and it will only show the RAW HTML The thing about preview is V0 uses DEVELOPMENT SERVER like (vite dev, next dev, npm run dev) that automatically compiles PostCSS, Tailwind, or other assets and that is why you dont have any problem with preview. and then in the other side VERCEL doesnt know how to compile without postcss config file and it runs wihtout it because its not an error and then ignores
Kasu Im yet to test but im reluctant to spend 30 dollars more when my first attempts were met with empty no code responses. still waiting reimbursement on that
Pauline P. Narvas Thanks for the positive feedback about the v0-1.0-md model pricing! It’s great to hear you find the charges reasonable. We appreciate users like you who provide honest feedback - both when there are concerns and when things are working well.
